Canadian IT sovereignty

Canada’s IT Sovereignty Standard

An independent framework for evaluating the ownership, governance, operational control and strategic alignment of technology service providers supporting Canadian organizations.

?

The central question

Who ultimately owns, governs and controls the technology partner your organization depends upon?

The Foundation

The Goverment of Canada recognizes three dimensions of digital sovereignty

01

Data Sovereignty

Where data resides, under whose laws it operates, and who has jurisdiction and control.

02

Operational Sovereignty

Who controls how digital services are deployed and operated, and whether the organization is dependent upon or exposed to foreign entities.

03

Technological sovereignty

Whether an organization retains the ability to make independent technology decisions without becoming overly dependent upon monopolistic or foreign-controlled vendors.

Canada’s IT Sovereignty Standard applies these principles specifically to the strategic technology service-provider relationship

FOR BOARDS & EXECUTIVE LEADERS

Your technology partner is part of your risk environment

For organizations where technology is fundamental to business operations, the ownership and governance of a strategic IT provider can introduce considerations around

These are increasingly enterprise governance and risk considerations, not simply procurement considerations.

Control

Who ultimately controls a critical technology function?

Continuity

What happens if the provider is acquired?

Geopolitical dependency

Could external ownership introduce additional dependency?

Strategic alignment

Whose priorities ultimately determine investment and direction?

Customer priority

Will your organization remain strategically important after consolidation?

Economic impact

Where does the economic value created through the relationship ultimately accrue?

THE MATRIX IS NOT A RANKING

The Matrix does not rank technology providers based on capability, quality, size or customer satisfaction

A provider can be an excellent technology company and still not be Sovereign Compliant. The Matrix answers a narrower question:
Who ultimately owns and controls this technology partner?

THREE POSSIBLE OUTCOMES

Sovereign Compliant

The available evidence satisfies the applicable Canadian sovereignty criteria.

Not Sovereign Compliant

The available evidence demonstrates material non-Canadian ultimate ownership or control.

Unverified

There is insufficient reliable evidence to make a definitive determination.

Unverified does not mean non-compliant. It means the available evidence is insufficient to make the determination.